Daniil Ostapenkov vs Nikolai Barsukov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance shows Nikolai Barsukov winning 44.61% of points, compared to Daniil Ostapenkov's 42.04%. Could this give Barsukov a slight edge in serve reliability?
• In return games, Barsukov has claimed 47.87% of second serve points, outpacing Ostapenkov's 43.39%. Do these stats tilt the favor towards Barsukov for breaking serves?
• Barsukov's 28.33% first serve return success surpasses Ostapenkov's 25.29%. Does this effectively position Barsukov to handle aggressive servers better?
• Under pressure, Barsukov excels at saving 56.12% of breakpoints, while Ostapenkov manages 43.51%. Will Barsukov maintain composure in critical moments?
• In the past year, Barsukov has won 43.75% of matches, whereas Ostapenkov has achieved a higher 72.73% win rate. What does this suggest about Ostapenkov's overall consistency?
• Surface preferences reveal Barsukov winning 71% on indoor hard courts, but only 13% on hard courts. Meanwhile, Ostapenkov shines with 71% on hard courts and struggles on clay with 48%. Is the surface a deciding factor?
• Player levels indicate Barsukov competes in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, winning 42.86%, whereas Ostapenkov holds a 72.73% success rate at the same level. Does this reflect Ostapenkov's superior experience?
• Opponents’ average ranks faced by Barsukov is 448, as opposed to Ostapenkov's 284.49. Could playing higher-ranked opponents give Ostapenkov an advantage?
• In deciding sets, Barsukov has a 45% win rate, whereas Ostapenkov tops this with 60%. Who is more likely to clinch a tight match?
• In breakpoint conversion, Barsukov's 34.69% edges out Ostapenkov's 30.25%. Can this marginal efficiency make a significant impact?

Editorial Prediction (November 16, 2025, UTC):

Assessing the performance patterns and recent statistics between Nikolai Barsukov and Daniil Ostapenkov presents an intriguing contrast of strengths and weaknesses.

Barsukov’s slight advantage in serving and returning could potentially offer a competitive edge, particularly in tight exchanges during the match. His ability to manage breakpoints effectively further complements his resilience under pressure.

On the other hand, Ostapenkov's higher match win percentage over the past year and experience against stronger opponents suggest a consistency that Barsukov has not yet achieved. Furthermore, Ostapenkov's ability to prevail in deciding sets positions him as a formidable competitor in extended rallies.

Taking the surface preference into consideration, Ostapenkov shows adaptability on hard courts, where both players have varying levels of success. While Barsukov’s indoor hard court performance is admirable, Ostapenkov's broader success in hard courts may prove advantageous.

Given the overall match play, experience, and consistency factors, Daniil Ostapenkov is poised as the likely victor in their upcoming clash.